Who doesn't love a good ranking? Join the Fifth Worlders as they rank the MCU movies and comment on them. Every Friday, we will host a virtual panel session on a topic of the week, capturing The Fifth World staff having a dialogue about a given subject. This week's topic: ranking the MCU movies!
| Chris Maka | JL Franke | Sean Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Captain America: Winter Soldier Captain America: Civil War Guardians of the Galaxy Avengers Ant-Man Captain America: The First Avenger Doctor Strange Avengers: Age of Ultron Iron Man Thor: Ragnarok Spider-Man: Homecoming Thor: The Dark World Iron Man 3 Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol 2 Thor Iron Man 2 The Incredible Hulk |
Avengers Captain America: Winter Soldier Spider-Man: Homecoming Iron Man Captain America: The First Avenger Guardians of the Galaxy Doctor Strange Captain America: Civil War Ant-Man Thor Avengers: Age of Ultron Thor: The Dark World Thor: Ragnarok The Incredible Hulk Iron Man 3 Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol 2 Iron Man 2 |
Captain America: Civil War Thor: Ragnarok Captain America: Winter Soldier Avengers Ant-Man Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol 2 Guardians of the Galaxy Iron Man Doctor Strange Spider-Man: Homecoming Captain America: The First Avenger Thor Thor: The Dark World The Incredible Hulk Avengers: Age of Ultron Iron Man 2 Iron Man 3 |
| Marc Singer | Greg Morrow |
|---|---|
| BEST OF THE BEST Iron Man Captain America: Winter Soldier TOP SHELF Captain America Captain America: Civil War Thor: Ragnarok Avengers Thor Spider-Man: Homecoming Ant-Man MIDDLE OF THE PACK Avengers: Age of Ultron Doctor Strange Iron Man 2 MEH The Incredible Hulk Iron Man 3 Guardians of the Galaxy Guardians of the Galaxy 2 WORST OF THE WORST Thor: The Dark World |
TOP TWO, TIED Captain America: Winter Soldier Avengers TOP SHELF, IN APPROXIMATE ORDER Iron Man Guardians of the Galaxy Captain America: The First Avenger Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol 2 SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOP SHELF BUT WASN'T, STORY PROBLEMS Captain America: Civil War SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOP SHELF BUT WASN'T, STUDIO INTERFERENCE Avengers: Age of Ultron PERFECTLY GOOD BUT NOT EXTRAORDINARY, IN APPROXIMATE ORDER Thor: Ragnarok Iron Man 2 Iron Man 3 Thor The Incredible Hulk Thor: The Dark World CLICHE ORIGINS THAT FAIL THE SEXY LAMP TEST aka I WEEP FOR SQUANDERED POTENTIAL Ant-Man Doctor Strange N/A, HAVEN'T SEEN YET Spider-Man: Homecoming |
JL Franke
Here are our aggregate rankings:
1 Captain America:
Winter Soldier
2 Avengers
3 Captain America:
Civil War
4 Iron Man
5 Captain America:
The First Avenger
6 Guardians of the
Galaxy
7 Thor: Ragnarok
8 Spider-Man:
Homecoming
9 Ant-Man
10 Doctor Strange
11 Avengers: Age
of Ultron
12 Thor
13 Guardians of
the Galaxy, Vol 2
14 Thor: The Dark
World
15 Iron Man 3
16 Iron Man 2
17 The Incredible
Hulk
 |
| Here's the data. This indicates which movies had the most and least consensus among those of us voting, as well as which movies each of us diverged from the pack the most. |
JL Franke
When we talked earlier, we came to the conclusion of
focusing on the movies we have the most disagreement first, before turning it
into a free-for-all. Looking at the aggregate list from last to first, we do a
surprising amount of agreeing on the bottom tier of films.
Marc Singer
That doesn't surprise me at all.
Sean Fields
Everything sucks the same.
Marc Singer
It's easy to agree when something is widely panned;
prioritizing the ones everybody liked is harder.
JL Franke
Quite true.
Chris Maka
I actually like all of these movies -- I am very much the intended audience for this stuff, and they continue to deliver right to my wheelhouse. I'm no judge of which movies are technically or objectively better or worse than another, so I ranked them by how much I enjoy rewatching them. The only one tough to rank was Ragnarok, because it's not out on video yet, and it may grow on me more and rise up the rankings -- hard to say.
Greg Morrow
I actually like all of these movies -- I am very much the intended audience for this stuff, and they continue to deliver right to my wheelhouse. I'm no judge of which movies are technically or objectively better or worse than another, so I ranked them by how much I enjoy rewatching them. The only one tough to rank was Ragnarok, because it's not out on video yet, and it may grow on me more and rise up the rankings -- hard to say.
Greg Morrow
Ant-Man: By the fucking numbers, not a single unusual or
unexpected story beat. The tank in the pocket could not have been more obvious.
The final fight putting the daughter in jeopardy could not have been more
obvious. Sexist as hell -- Competent woman shunted aside in favor of shlubby
man who can do her job better with less training despite being comically
incompetent to start with, and then she is awarded to him as a prize by the
movie. Fails the Bechdel test. Fails the Mako Mori test. Ex-wife is a nothing;
all the business is given to her new boyfriend, leaving her nothing.
The sidekick was fun, though. Good storytelling.
Doctor Strange: Not only by the numbers, it's by the same
numbers as Ant-Man: Incompetent man given the keys to the kingdom and becomes
improbably competent in far less time than people who have been studying far
longer. Another fucking origin story. What I wanted was Dr. Strange, Master of
the Mystic Arts, Sorcerer Supreme, not This Guy Who Learns a Few Spells and Has
a Living Cloak.
The cloak failed to meet expectations; people loved it,
and I was meh.
 |
| Don't dis the cloak. How else will a Sorcerer Supreme stay warm? |
The only way it manages to be less overtly sexist than
Ant-Man is by erasing women more thoroughly. You can practically see the script
rewrites floating by as Rachel McAdams's role goes from some degree of being
integral to being an afterthought. Fails the Bechdel Test. Fails the Mako Mori
test. Fails the Sexy Lamp test.
And I was unimpressed at the reiteration of Inception
citywarping. I will concede that I don't really have the visual processing
skills to get what all the citywarping was supposed to be doing -- I assume
that it had a purpose beyond "looks cool", and that we were supposed
to be seeing struggles for control in the citywarping between the combatants --
but in the end, all I saw was purposelessness.
I liked the way Strange trapped Dormammu.
Ultimately, the two films -- which were not unwatchable,
just not _good_ -- failed in several ways: They offered nothing new and the
same old problems, in the same way as each other, when nearly adjacent to each
other in the series.
JL Franke
Do you have terse definitions for Mako Mori and sexy lamp
tests? I’m not familiar with them.
Greg Morrow
Mako Mori: a) at least one female character;
b) who gets her own narrative arc;
c) that is not about supporting a man’s story.
Sexy Lamp: The Sexy Lamp test. If you can take out a female
character and replace her with a sexy lamp, YOU’RE A FUCKING HACK.
 |
| Ant-Man cut scene? |
JL Franke
Ah. Thanks!
You liked gotg2 and IM2 more than others. Anything you’d
like to say to those?
Greg Morrow
GOTG2: Not the same story; in fact, more than one story, a
good script well structured. Good integration of Marvel space stuff. Good
integration of music. The only sour note was the arbitrariness of Yondu's death
-- it had no inevitability given the technology present in the setting, only
contrivance. It was, in basically all respects like the original, without being
the same as the original and not believing that it had to be bigger, louder,
higher stakes than the original, which is basically the ideal sequel.
IM2: I think it's important to consider its context as only
the 2nd or 3rd (depending on the dubious integrality of IH) marvel film. Like
GotG2, it was a whole lot of like the original without being the same as the
original; the only flaw was the fight at the end, which did fall prey to the
"bigger louder higher stakes" problem (IM3 did even worse in that
regard). In retrospect, more of its flaws may be more visible.
But "that is not my bird" gets quoted all the
time in my circle. You can't beat Sam Rockwell's performance. They had the
briefcase suit. They made fucking Whiplash at least marginally plausible. They
introduced Widow and Johansson played the hell out of her. Favreau let himself
look foolish and weak. And it took Fury's appearance in IM and not only said
this isn't just a fire-and-forget easter egg, this is integral to Marvel going
forward.
Chris Maka
Wow, that's a great defense of IM2.
Greg Morrow
Some of my opinions are arbitrary and idiosyncratic. Some
are not.
Chris Maka
Right there with ya.
Greg Morrow
I neglected to mention War Machine, who also fit and filled
out the movie and gave Stark someone to play off who was a peer in the way that
Pepper, Hammer, and Fury/Widow weren't.
Chris Maka
I think IM2 and IH are the only two I don't own. May need
to pick up IM2 and give it another chance.
Greg Morrow
Just having the briefcase suit and having it look awesome
earns mad points, at least in terms of credibility to me as a comic book fan.
They're NOT making fun of it, they're not going on about whether its cheesy,
they're using it sincerely and trusting the audience to agree with them that
it's a genuine fuck-yeah moment.
JL Franke
Greg's already addressed why he thinks Iron Man 2 rates
better than tied for last. Does anyone have
anything to say to that?
Marc Singer
Yeah, I think Iron Man 2 could have been a great movie that
gets progressively ruined by studio interference.
I enjoy the opening sequences, the Monte Carlo race, the
Silver Centurion suit, Whiplash, all that stuff.
JL Franke
Do tell. Where do
you think the interference comes in? Is
it the pushing of Avengers?
Sean Fields
I think Greg's points are good, but I was just bored as
hell with Iron Man 2 for some reason.
Marc Singer
The movie commits to telling the "Demon in a
Bottle" story when Disney (which had just bought Marvel) wouldn't allow
them to go all the way and make Tony Stark an alcoholic. This should go without
saying, but you cannot do that story without the alcoholism. It just cuts the
heart out.
 |
| RDJ in this story would have been amazing. |
So everything after that godawful party/DJ scene is just
aimless.
JL Franke
That is true. But it
will be far from the last time Disney pulls back from the stunning drama that
populates Marvel Comics.
Marc Singer
No, but it was the first and probably the worst.
Sean Fields
It'll be the worst unless they tell that creepy Captain
Marvel baby story.
 |
| Not one of Marvel's finer moments. |
Chris Maka
Shane Black wanted to get into the Demon In a Bottle stuff
in IM3, and Disney did the same neutering.
JL Franke
I'm surprised so many folks here are positive on
Whiplash. He was one of the things that
tanked it for me. Mickey Rourke whining
about his bird in a bad accent just killed me, and not in a good way.
Marc Singer
The various MCU elements in IM2 ranged from well done
(Black Widow) to poor (that damn shield) depending on how obligatory they were.
I liked him better than Sam Rockwell as Justin Hammer. I
could see what they were going for, Hammer as a knockoff of RDJ's Stark
specifically, but he just never felt menacing.
JL Franke
Widow was definitely a high point for the film. Too bad she's so supposedly unmarketable.
Marc Singer
(In part because the thing Hammer actually hurts Stark
with, the alcoholism, was cut out of the movie.) Rourke definitely had menacing down.
JL Franke
I guess I just didn't see him as menacing. I thought he was ridiculously overpowered for
a half-naked man.
 |
| Give him his bird. |
Sean Fields
He had that "I'll shiv you in the shower" menace
happening.
Marc Singer
I liked him as the half-naked self-made superweapon of the
first half more than the big armored suit of the finale.
Sean Fields
I agree with that, Marc.
Marc Singer
But I suppose all the IM movies after the first have the
problem of, what are you going to pit IM against if not another guy in an even
bigger armored suit?
Say, can I talk about the first Iron Man?
JL Franke
I do think you hit it when you decried the disappearance of
the alcoholism, Marc.
Sure, fire away.
Marc Singer
We all liked it, but I liked it significantly more than
everybody else. That's because I've taught it a couple of times, and I've liked
it more each time I've gone back to teach it - a surefire sign that we have a
winner.
With a few exceptions, any of these movies are
crowd-pleasers in the theater, but Iron Man rewards repeat viewing in a way I
did not expect.
JL Franke
How so?
Marc Singer
The characters feel more layered than they first appear -
Tony Stark is clearly dealing with PTSD in the first movie, not just IM3 - and
the storytelling is rock solid.
JL Franke
Is it just PTSD or is it also a significant attack of
growing a conscience? I think he may
have both going on, and certainly the latter is directly from the comics.
Marc Singer
There's a point where I realized that every single
character, even Pepper, tells Tony to abandon his mission to reform himself and
go back to being an arms dealer or a spoiled playboy. The only one who stands
by him all the way through the film is that servo!
He is a posthuman hero for a posthuman age.
JL Franke
Huh. I had not
looked at it like that before, but it certainly makes sense.
Sean Fields
I think Tony still has PTSD and that's how we ended up with
Age of Ultron.
Marc Singer
Also, I love the retelling of the origin (which is faithful
to the comics but also perfectly updated for the War on Terror) and the whole
Gulmira sequence in the middle, which is a textbook case for a Hollywood film
telling a divided audience exactly what they want to hear about American power
during an uncertain time and an unpopular war.
Nobody would confuse it for an arthouse film, but Favreau
knows exactly what he's doing.
JL Franke
One of the issues I have with the overall MCU arc is that
they mix together Stark and Hank Pym.
Ultron just being the most obvious.
Marc Singer
One of the issues I have is that they give Stark all of
Hawkeye's quips, so Hawkeye has no personality!
JL Franke
It is one of the better origin films made in the
genre. Really, the only thing I faulted
it for was having a snoozefest of a villain (well acted as he was). But that's an issue that runs rampant through
most Marvel films.
Marc Singer
I think IM's origin and Cap's origin are note-perfect.
JL Franke
So wait, RDJ is playing a Tony/Hank/Clint hybrid? He's actually the Super Adaptoid!
 |
| We go deep in our allusions here. |
I agree, Marc. Which
brings us to Cap, where we all liked the first film, but Sean liked it a little
less than the rest of us. Want to
comment, Sean?
Sean Fields
I liked Cap but I didn't have perhaps as much fun with Cap
as opposed to the films I picked ahead of it. Cap is a pitch perfect origin
film and ticks off all the boxes for story. I just enjoy the goofier elements
of a Ragnarok or GOTG Vol 2 more.
Marc Singer
The only problem I have with Cap is that it doesn't handle
the transition from "origin story" to "war movie" all that
well.
Sean Fields
With that being said Cap being Cap was why I found myself really
liking Civil War and Winter Soldier.
Marc Singer
And I actually like the USO sequence! I just don't like it
as a bridge into the war story part of the movie.
Like, I get it's more "realistic" that the army
would not send their one and only super-soldier into combat, but realism is not
why we go to Marvel movies.
Sean Fields
(I also think I would have had a different opinion if I
didn't see WW this year)
Marc Singer
I don't think anybody would have objected if General Stan
Lee or somebody just said, "Son, go punch some Nazis."
 |
| "Go ahead, son. Nazis won't punch themselves." |
JL Franke
Actually, I don't find that part realistic at all.
I could see them not letting him go into combat if they
thought they could replicate the formula with some additional research on him,
but to just use him as a war bond salesman was actually the worst part for me.
I've not met many military decision makers who sit back on their weapons unless
they're the single-use kind.
Marc Singer
I thought the number was cute on its own terms (nobody does
a period piece like Joe Johnston) but it grinds the story to a halt. In fact it
sticks the story in a well that it then has to climb out of.
JL Franke
Agreed. So why did
you like it so much? You were highest of
all of us on it.
Marc Singer
Because this is a minor structural quibble with a movie
that otherwise gets just about everything right.
And really, if you get Captain America right - and nobody
gets Cap right like Chris Evans gets Cap right - that's the moral core for the
entire MCU right there.
(Also, I am a huge fan of The Rocketeer. Marvel chose their
director wisely.)
 |
| An underrated classic. |
JL Franke
For me, I loved the supporting cast -- one of the strongest
in the MCU -- and loved the fact that they had a really solid villain. The appearance (and relative faithfulness) of
the Howling Commandos gave me fanboy goosebumps. And the scene where he walks all the POWs
back to camp was a major chill moment in the movie series for me.
True, it was a great match.
Marc Singer
Since we're on the origin movies, how about Thor?
JL Franke
Sean, I let your WW comment almost slide off the
screen. Can you expand on that?
Marc Singer
(I'll wait)
Sean Fields
I feel that WW felt more like a soldier making the big
sacrifice of giving up her home to go to war. Cap and WW did it for the right
reasons but I somehow felt more engaged with Diana going into the world,
learning about our flaws and still fighting. I also just liked the fighting
better.
But Red Skull >Ares
JL Franke
Jeff Bridges riding a segway and puffing a stogie >
Ares.
 |
| Let's see Ares look this chill on a Segway. |
Marc Singer
Yeah, the Red Skull is a much better villain. And good
news, everybody--he's relevant again!
(pardon me while I pour myself whatever Tony was having in
IM2)
JL Franke
There's a part of me that's surprised Thor's not ranked
higher. I liked it quite a bit, and it's
solidly made and has one of the best villains the MCU has produced. But for some reason I don't find it nearly as
rewatchable.
My one real complaint about Winter Soldier was they backed
off the idea that Redford was playing the Red Skull. That would have really elevated the film, I
think, to show how easy America could embrace some of the ideals of the Nazis
without even thinking about it.
Sean Fields
I liked Thor but the idea of Thor for me is always this
that this dummy who fights with everyone kinda learns to be better and he
doesn't truly get to that until Ragnarok. Also, it's epic at times but has
shifted down the list with each new MCU entry.
Marc Singer
Clearly Winter Soldier came out a couple years too early.
Sean Fields
Or Redford as Hate-Monger.
 |
| A sadly relevant villain these days. |
Marc Singer
I may be slightly overvaluing Thor because I'm still
basking in the glory that was Ragnarok.
But I don't think so. Marvel generally does their origin
movies very well, and Thor was no exception. It used to be in my top 5 until
the better sequels pushed it out.
Sean Fields
You need that first movie to get to Ragnarok but it's
definitely not as good.
JL Franke
Is it time for me to talk about how I did not see the same
movie as you guys on Ragnarok already?
Sean Fields
Go for it.
Marc Singer
Not yet.
JL Franke
Okay, I'll hold. :-)
We all uniformly panned Dark World, but I wonder if we did it
for the same reasons.
Marc Singer
Thor works on its own terms because it gets the family
drama right, it builds the greatest villain in the MCU, and it pulls off the
neat trick of making Asgard work even though it has to split its focus between
two different worlds.
(To get a sense of how hard this is to do, compare Thor to
another superhero movie that came out in 2011 and ask yourself: how did you
like Oa?)
 |
| In fairness, OA was far from Green Lantern's biggest problem. |
All the things that were internal to that movie worked. My
only complaints were 1) the awful "Hawkeye" scene (NOTE: does not
actually contain Hawkeye) and 2) not enough Destroyer.
JL Franke
True.
Marc Singer
And 1) was studio mandated. On its own terms, Thor is
great.
Sean Fields
Really? I didn't even like Loki as a villain until later. I
thought everyone was kinda simple in that first go-round.
Marc Singer
Also the only one of the Thor movies to do justice to the
Warriors Three. (pours out whatever Tony was drinking in IM2)
Sean Fields
I will give you the Warriors Three and Sif point though.
Marc Singer
I thought Loki was richest in Thor because that's where his
family conflicts are most pronounced.
JL Franke
My issues were the frost giants were pretty bland and the
fact that it ruins some of its pacing for humor that's not the best timed. The scene where the Warriors Three and Sif
are smiling and waving through the window is cute, but I thought it tripped up
the tempo that the movie had established.
 |
| Reminder, that's Hogun "the Grim" on the left. |
I've yet to be disappointed by Loki in any of the movies.
Marc Singer
The fish-out-of-water stuff is my least favorite part of
that movie, but it works to propel us through that stage of Thor's exile and
redemption. But the family drama on Asgard is solid.
JL Franke
But oh, that Sif scene where she eventually skewers the
Destroyer? Give me more of that, please.
I agree. Well-developed
and well-acted. I think that's where
Branagh is at his best.
Marc Singer
Yeah, the Destroyer was great. I remember when it came out
I couldn't believe that a big-budget Hollywood film was doing Kirby designs
that faithfully. We take it for granted now, but back then we weren't so far
removed from superhero movies that were embarrassed to be superhero movies.
Did you want to move on to the sequels?
JL Franke
Yes. I asked earlier
about how much we all (relatively) disliked Dark World. What were the main issues we had?
Dvandom
(pokes head in) Dark World is really the only one I have no
desire to see again. There were several
forgettable MCU movies, many with fridge logic of worse, but Dark World has all
of those AND it was rendered largely irrelevant by Ragnarok's sharp veer. Could a Ragnarok that actually followed
through on Dark World have been good?
Maybe, but irrelevant now, as is Dark World.
Marc Singer
Kind of like Iron Man 2, they feint towards a classic comic
book storyline (Simonson's Casket of Ancient Winters stuff) and then veer away,
providing something much less interesting in its place.
Sean Fields
Dark World felt rushed and kinda just a vehicle to get the
Aether into the greater MCU.
Dvandom
Now, there's a bunch I haven't seen again, but that's because
I dislike Disney's practice of releasing bare-bones DVDs in order to try to
push BluRay sales (I have no BluRay player, and no particular interest in
getting one).
JL Franke
Dark World did seem like the first movie kidnapped by
Marvel's desire to have an Infinity Stone in every pot.
Sean Fields
Kurse was also very Darth Maul in it. Wanted him to do more
and be cooler but alas, no.
Marc Singer
The movie also cannot reconcile its high drama on Asgard
(which is completely leaden) and its comedy on Earth (which is forced and
painfully unfunny - I mean, somebody thought "Selvig doesn't have
pants" would be their big laugh moment). It's like somebody watched the
first Thor and put it through that ray that makes Bizarros.
JL Franke
As well as Kat Denning's inability to say Mjolnir.
Marc Singer
That was funny the first time... in the first movie.
JL Franke
I also found Malekith as played by Eccleston a completely
uninteresting character.
Marc Singer
Yeah, zero personality. Which he doesn't have in the comics
either, but because he's so steeped in Celtic lore he doesn't need it. Malekith
in Simonson's comics is a mythological character. In the film he's just a
generic Evil Alien.
But speaking of aliens... are we ready for Ragnarok?
Sean Fields
They could have made the Dark Elves more sympathetic bad
guys. Like these Asgardians are taking our stuff that's why we fight.
JL Franke
Part of that is Marvel/Disney doing that whole
"they're not really gods" thing, which I was glad to see Ragnarok
step back from at least a little bit.
Sure Marc.
Marc Singer
I think you're the odd man out on this one. Why didn't it
work for you?
JL Franke
I covered a lot of this in my entry in the Ragnarok panel
as well as my post on Marvel movies in general. Essentially, I hated the fact
that the film took three giant, epic, meaty, dramatic tales, and reduced them
to farce and romp.
There's being creative with your source material and then
there's taking a colossal dump on your source material. Ragnarok felt like the latter to me.
Marc Singer
I can see that. The funny thing is, even though Waititi
jettisoned Simonson's plot, he captured the spirit of those stories so much
better than Dark World. Which is not hard, as DW didn't even try, but still.
JL Franke
True on DW not trying.
I didn't feel like they were trying to adapt anything. It was almost like they pulled Malekith's
name out of a hat.
Marc Singer
But the scenes of Loki getting hoisted on his own petard
like the trickster that he is, those felt true both to Simonson and to the
legends that Simonson was also drawing on and adapting into his own idiom.
JL Franke
Loki rocks in every movie, great and small.
Marc Singer
The other thing I liked about Ragnarok was that it managed
to balance the mythological parts with the space odyssey that has always been a
part of Thor since Kirby.
In some ways, this was the most Marvel of all the Marvel
movies -- "Hey, we've got Surtur and Hela and the Executioner, but we've
also got the Grandmaster!"
JL Franke
Though Surtur is a comic foil, Hela is a vamp, Executioner
is nowhere near as badass, and Grandmaster is pretty awesome, but nothing like
the comics.
Marc Singer
I didn't even think Surtur was a comic foil. They play him
that way in the opening, but by the end there's nothing funny about him. I
liked that move.
JL Franke
True, at the end of the movie, he was the Enterprise's
self-destruct sequence. But he was never
scary, and when I first read Simonson's story, boy was he ever scary.
Sean Fields
That actually touches on something I talked about with a friend earlier today tangentially related to this. But it is spoilery for The Punisher and I'm not sure I
should bring it up.
JL Franke
I haven't seen it yet, but can deal with spoilers.
Sean Fields
Well, if you read the Punisher comics then it won't really
matter but I can save it for a bit for the end.
JL Franke
Sure.
Marc Singer
Jerry: Yeah, they would have had to commit to a whole movie about Surtur and Asgard. I can see the complaint that Ragnarok had too many disparate elements to do them all justice, but god, would I rather have that problem than a movie like Dark World that doesn't have nearly enough in it.
Also: Goldblum, man. Goldblum.
JL Franke
I firmly believe you can make a faithful adaptation of the
Surtur Saga (at least in tone if not plot points) and still have it be really,
really good.
Marc Singer
Oh, I do too. But after Dark World, was it even worth
trying to redeem that? They got off to a terrible start that didn't even set up
the next movie properly. Better to go with a clean break, I think.
JL Franke
I have no issue with Goldblum as the Grandmaster. He's nothing like the comics version, but
that's not a big thing for me.
Marc Singer
I thought he was a delight. I would love to see him and
Benicio del Toro's equally weird Collector play some role in the Infinity Wars,
but I kind of doubt Marvel is going to bother picking up those threads. I think
they're just going to cut straight to the main event on Earth.
Sean Fields
Goldblum as Grandmaster was a great parallel for BDT's
Collector.
JL Franke
I'm also disappointed that (probably thanks to Incredible
Hulk poisoning the well), they decided to turn Planet Hulk into part of the
comedy. Ruffalo would have acted the
hell out of a true adaptation.
Agreed, Sean. On
that note, can we turn our attention to Guardians?
Marc Singer
Yeah, that could have easily supported its own film too.
But, again, better a movie that combines too many good ideas than one that
can't muster a single one of its own.
JL Franke
Marc liked the first much less than you and I did, while he
and I liked the second far less than you.
For Infinity War, it looks like they're combining some
elements from the original miniseries and some from the Hickman Infinity
series. I'm actually pretty stoked about
the possibilities there.
(So yes Marc, I agree that they're going to drop both
Grandmaster and Collector threads)
Marc Singer
(single tear)
Sean Fields
I had FUN with Guardians 2. I probably enjoyed it for
similar reasons as to why I enjoyed Civil War more than others might have. I
think everyone was really human and had to examine themselves, and although
there can be arguments for how much growth everyone actually made it was a true
illustration of each character and their flaws.
Plus it was bright and had spaceships and a giant Pac-Man
fighting in a planet's core. It made me feel better as a human that even aliens
had jerkasses.
JL Franke
I think the largest issue I had with GotG2 was that the
heroes were so passive. Aside from
purposely taking the mission they're on when the movie first starts, everything
else is them reacting to stuff happening to them. It feels less heroic in that way and also
starts to be vulnerable to the same analysis protagonists in horror films
usually fall prey to.
Marc Singer
I didn't care for GOTG2 for the same reason Greg liked it:
it was too close to the original. Except in my case I didn't really care for
the original.
Sean Fields
That's the thing to me though -- I don't think the
Guardians are heroes.
JL Franke
But I did greatly enjoy the first film. What didn't you like about it, Marc?
Marc Singer
But the movies completely want us to root for them. If they
want to do a movie about antiheroes, fine, but make them actual antiheroes, not
cute and cuddly rascals.
JL Franke
I'm fine with them being mercenaries and thieves as
well. But dang, act with some agency,
please.
Sean Fields
They are a-holes but not 100 percent dicks. They are a
bunch of Han Solos.
 |
| Nothing wrong with that. |
JL Franke
Which is good, since I'm not sure you can be an outie and
an innie at the same time.
Sean Fields
I root for them in opposition to 100 percent dicks. The
Nova Corps are the heroes of the first film.
Marc Singer
The GOTG movies just aren't my sense of humor. Too many of
the jokes are built around wacky CGI characters, glaringly obvious video game
references, retro pop hits that have already been used in plenty of other
movies.
I mean, you get no points for raiding Quentin Tarantino's
record collection unless you're actually Quentin Tarantino, you know?
Basically, I think the GOTG movies are engines for
generating memes.
JL Franke
Oh man, a Tarantino GotG film would be something. "I'm
Mary Poppins, y'all!"
Marc Singer
Which is the smart play to make in 2017, economically
speaking. But it's not what I'm looking for in a movie.
JL Franke
Funny, but man, does that feel disrespectful to the comics
Yondu.
Marc Singer
A Tarantino GOTG movie would be something the Gunn movies
are trying to be, and falling far short of. And right now, a thousand Disney lawyers
are launching into action to make sure that NEVER FUCKING HAPPENS.
JL Franke
Marc, you remind me of my statement that the Marvel movies
are fun flicks, but largely fail to be great films. I think there are moments of brilliance (some
of Whedon's camera work in Avengers is being copied by other movies now), but
largely they feel churned out to make lots of dollars and set up the next flick
to earn lots of dollars. Commerce vs.
art.
Marc Singer
OK, now that I've gotten that off my chest: Did anybody
else think GOTG2 would have worked much better if Kurt Russell had been playing
Eros instead of Ego?
 |
| That's Starfox to you, sir. |
JL Franke
YES
Marc Singer
As both an antagonist and Star-Lord's dad and oh god I
can't believe I'm invested in this
Sean Fields
Would have been another Thanos connection so yeah, maybe.
JL Franke
I think anything that could have saved on exposition would
have been a major win.
Sean Fields
Imagine if they just stuck to the comic book origin.
Marc Singer
Jerry: I don't think any superhero movies really achieve
"great film" except for maybe The Dark Knight - they just don't have
that kind of ambition. But the Marvel movies work very, very well as
entertainment, which is all I'm looking for.
JL Franke
I'll point toward Logan as another example, and parts of
Wonder Woman (oh, what could have been), but I largely agree.
Marc Singer
There is something to be said for doing commerce with skill
and panache and some affection for the source material.
JL Franke
True. The better Bond
movies are a great example of that.
Marc Singer
Logan managed to depress me, which is not usually a
reaction superhero movies intentionally set out to achieve.
Sean Fields
Which is actually a good place to ask my kinda Punisher
related question -- how close to the source material should the movies/shows
be? As a comic book fan, the surprises or character reveals are often killed
for me because I know who the character is beforehand.
JL Franke
My opinion is that they don't have to be beholden to the
source material except 1) the soul of the characters should be the same, and 2)
if you're adapting a major, historically good story, you should be pretty damn
faithful.
Marc Singer
In most cases, I think the spirit matters more than the letter -- I'll take Taika Waititi's energetically faithful mishmash of story ideas over, I don't know... (trying to think of a superhero movie hurt by faithfulness to the comics - it's a pretty thin list - Green Lantern, maybe?)
JL Franke
Watchmen?
Marc Singer
Oh god, yes. Talk about the letter and not the spirit.
 |
| What wasted potential. |
JL Franke
Yeah. For the best
adaptations, you should have both. And
if you can't have both, go for spirit and use the characters in a wholly
original story. (See: Dark Knight)
Marc Singer
You have to make some concessions to the different medium --
you're dealing with one (or a very few) two-hour installment instead of months
or years’ worth of short installments.
Sean Fields
I like the both approach. I love comic book stories and
arcs but sometimes when I reread them I'll say I'm glad that they are in this
format and not live action. Same thing with anime.
Exactly.
JL Franke
True.
Sean Fields
I also like a new twist on an idea, done properly. It's the
done properly part that is the problem.
JL Franke
So we've hit most Marvel movies, but I did want to talk
about Spider-Man: Homecoming. I was
first surprised that it did so well in my bottom-up analysis, and then I was
doubly surprised that everyone else liked it a lot less than me.
Marc Singer
I actually like it a lot -- like I said, I wasn't ranking
those middle ones too closely.
Sean Fields
Think it might be Spidey fatigue?
Marc Singer
The only reason I didn't rank Homecoming higher was that,
while the high points were very, very high (Keaton especially), it had some
weird story bumps in the middle.
JL Franke
That could be. I
admit I really don't care for the first half of the movie when it's really Iron
Man Jr. But wow, the second half (from
the opening of the door on homecoming night on) is perhaps the best Marvel film
they've done so far.
Marc Singer
Yeah, too much Tony Stark and too much shtick with the
suit. But once it becomes a Spider-Man movie again, it's a FANTASTIC Spider-Man
movie.
Sean Fields
Agree.
JL Franke
And I never would have thought I'd say this before seeing
the movie, but Vulture is probably Marvel's second-best movie villain.
Marc Singer
And I love how it opens up a whole new class of villains
for the MCU. Finally, some guys who aren't looking for an orb or a gem or a
stone - they just want to steal some shit!
Sean Fields
But I might also just hate Tony Stark as well.
JL Franke
And probably third-best adapted villain behind Loki and
Kingpin.
Sean Fields
Agree, Marc.
Marc Singer
Yeah, that character is so well conceived, from the visual
design to the concept of making him a scavenger (of course!).
JL Franke
I LOVE that it has nothing to do with the infinity
stones. Love love love love love that!
And he has real motivations. He's looking out for his family and sticking
it to the people he thinks stuck it to him. No going over the top to win at
business, no trying to conquer planets, no big abstract causes. Just basic human motivations we can all
understand.
Marc Singer
Just out of curiosity, who here predicted that Marvel would
put out a movie that made us love the Vulture before DC got around to freaking
Darkseid?
JL Franke
If the teaser from Justice League is any indication, they
may never get around to Darkseid.
Marc Singer
(steals a case of whatever Tony was drinking in IM2)
JL Franke
Sad, isn't it? The
decision making over at WB is atrocious.
But that's a different panel. :-)
Marc Singer
Before we launch into a very, very different panel, should
we talk about the other solo movies?
JL Franke
Yes! Who do we want
to cover next?
Marc Singer
I'll go to bat for Ant-Man, which I liked a lot more than I
ever expected to.
JL Franke
Go for it.
Marc Singer
Like I said before, Marvel does origin stories very well,
and this one is no exception. I also appreciated the variation in tone
(something WB needed to learn 4 or 5 years ago), the willingness to make both a
comedy and a caper movie.
One of the things Marvel does right is giving each film its
own generic identity while remaining firmly within the superhero genre.
JL Franke
I agree. And to my
points elsewhere, they wisely chose to do an original story that fit well with
the feel they were going for.
Marc Singer
So you get period piece superhero films, or spy movie superhero
films, or sci fi or what have you. Ant-Man came at the right time for a comedy.
And unlike GOTG, I felt the comedy was grounded in the characters and performances,
not the CGI.
Sean Fields
I like it but I also now see Greg’s points, ESPECIALLY
about the Wasp’s role in it.
Marc Singer
(Though that said, I loved the gags like the train fight,
which pulls a great trick of making us think we're watching a conventional
train fight before reminding us of the actual scale of events.)
Sean Fields
But then again if it was the Wasp’s movie it would have
been 15 minutes.
JL Franke
Good points. Really,
my only issues with Ant-Man were 1) The Evangeline Lilly character was pretty
much a waste, 2) The movie contradicts its own logic at times, and 3) it
features yet another evil businessman.
Marc Singer
I wanted to see the Wasp suit up, too. But the thing is, we
need to acknowledge that those complaints hold for almost any of these movies. I
mean, we still have yet to see a Marvel movie with a female lead. Even WB
eventually figured that one out!
JL Franke
True. Marvel seems
to hate the idea of having a super-heroine that does anything other than wrap
her legs around necks.
Sean Fields
It really sucks we never got a Widow film.
Marc Singer
My understanding is that was all down to Ike Perlmutter
nixing any movie centered around a non-white guy. As soon as Kevin Feige got
control of Marvel Studios, Black Panther and Captain Marvel got greenlit.
I still don't understand how they haven't done a Widow
film, though.
JL Franke
Good for Feige if true.
Sean Fields
Which is dumb because that’s pretty much easy money.
JL Franke
Though he could still green light a Widow movie any time he
wants. It's not like ScarJo is retired.
Marc Singer
Yeah, I don't get the logic there at all.
JL Franke
We keep coming up with movies we wish Marvel would do. This is two panels in one!
So what about Doctor Strange?
Marc Singer
Oh man, someday I will talk about my imaginary treatment
for a Falcon movie.
Sean Fields
Minority groups will show up for representation alone and
if it’s a good story? Easy money.
Black Panther is going to make truckloads of money for
Marvel.
Marc Singer
I was pretty cold on Doctor Strange. I mean, it hits all
the beats for a Marvel origin movie, but... it hits all the beats for a Marvel
origin movie.
JL Franke
And BP has the most promise I've seen of reaching for and
achieving that level of art that I feel is missing from Marvel films.
Marc Singer
Yeah, the trailers for BP look outstanding.
Sean Fields
Even before the trailers I was going to see it. They had my
wallet when they announced it with Coogler at the helm.
JL Franke
I think I would have been more down on Dr. Strange if it
didn't bring the Ditko Dimension to life.
I can forgive much with that.
I've been lukewarm about the past few movies (including
Strange, Civil War, and Ragnarok), but BP and IW both have me pretty stoked.
Marc Singer
I liked the visuals - this was one of the rare movies I saw
in IMAX 3D, and I didn't regret the decision. I'd be bored if I saw it on TV,
though.
(Wait - do we need to talk about Civil War?!?)
JL Franke
I can see that. I
purchased a copy of it and I still haven't found myself yearning to watch
it. Though I tend to get them. I think the only ones I don't own at the
moment are Civil War and GotG2.
Sean Fields
Dr. Strange will be the Avatar of MCU films in a decade.
JL Franke
It will receive three completely unnecessary sequels?
Did we skip Civil War?
That goes to show how much I think about it. :-)
Sean Fields
I enjoyed Civil War probably the most out of our group.
Marc Singer
OH, IT IS ON
Sean Fields
Did it have plot holes and issues? yes.
Is it a weird love triangle story? Yes.
Marc Singer
Civil War was another movie that, whatever its flaws (and I
didn't think it had that many) it perfectly captured the feel of Marvel comics.
Sean Fields
Do I still despise Tony? Yes.
Marc Singer
It had two moments that I never knew I wanted to see on
film until I saw them on film.
JL Franke
Do tell.
Marc Singer
And oddly for a movie about Captain America and Iron Man,
they both starred Ant-Man.
JL Franke
Ha!
Marc Singer
One was the restaging of the Hawkeye-shoots-an-arrow-with-Ant-Man-on-it
from that Avengers cover.
 |
| One of the all-time great covers. |
JL Franke
A wonderful issue.
Sean, so I'm not the only one with Tony fatigue? Or is this more personal?
Marc Singer
The other was the debut of Giant-Man and all the chaos that
ensued. (Which looked like it would have been FUN AS SHIT to film. Seriously,
if you gave me the opportunity to dress up as giant man and stumble around a
green screen and smash a scaled-down prop airplane? I am totally there.)
Sean Fields
Personal.
Marc Singer
I would happily remove Tony from other Marvel movies, but
not this one.
JL Franke
You're right, Marc.
I kind of want Marvel to replace Stan Lee cameos with Ant-Man cameos
now.
Care to expand, Sean?
Marc Singer
Paul Rudd is so great in that -- "Your shield, Captain
America!" He's simultaneously playing a guy who adores these heroes and
taking the piss out of them in one line.
JL Franke
It also doesn't hurt that Paul Rudd can do absolutely no
wrong.
Sean Fields
Tony is necessary for the MCU. He just does stuff with
limited thought of the fallout.
Marc Singer
Paul Rudd is the cowbell of the MCU.
JL Franke
There is something to be said for the idea that Tony Stark
is actually the biggest villain in the MCU.
Sean Fields
And for all his talk of being better he still is profiting
off of the fallout, especially in Spidey.
Marc Singer
I thought Tony was absolutely necessary for that movie -
the conflict between him and Steve feels very natural (once you get around the
contrived dilemma that sets the plot in motion - seriously, how was that the
Avengers' fault?) and very earned.
Sean Fields
Tony Stark is the architect of most of his own problems and
a global problem in Ultron.
Tony was definitely necessary for Civil War.
JL Franke
And that is something I wish they'd explore more. Disney/Marvel would never allow for one of
their stars to do a heel turn, but a movie where Iron Man does that turn could
be fabulous.
Marc Singer
And they introduced the Black Panther about as well as you
can introduce him in a storyworld that doesn't have the FF. He had just the
right ambiguity (hero or villain?) that Lee and Kirby brought to his first
comics appearance, without all the clichés that came with it.
The Russos have done a fantastic job with the Cap sequels,
and I think they are absolutely the right choice for Infinity War.
Sean Fields
Wouldn’t even be a heel turn just an evolution of his world
view of order and the future. Could become The Maker like Ultimate Reed
Richards.
 |
| Hopefully with better fashion sense. |
JL Franke
I see that. But he
disappears for much of the second half of the movie.
Though hopefully more interesting than The Maker. :-)
The Russos do know how to bring the gravitas to their
movies without it feeling forced.
Marc Singer
I kind of doubt that Tony or RDJ will be around after the
fourth Avengers movie, though. And honestly, that's probably for the best for
all concerned.
JL Franke
I agree, Marc.
Though I wonder how they're going to "retire" all of these
heroes. I don't think you can just kill
them all, but if you don't you run into the question of why aren't they around
for any of these big blowouts anymore.
Sean Fields
Thanos wrecks shop and then TIME STONE TIME! Reboots
history. Introducing mutants and F4.
Marc Singer
So, since we're on the subject... should we wrap this up with
the Avengers?
JL Franke
Sure! Who wants to
start?
Marc Singer
If they do that, I think they'd need to go total reboot for
the entire franchise. And I don't see them doing that, not with BP and Captain
Marvel still on deck.
JL Franke
Though could the Avengers who need to be
"retired" instead get "lost" in the event?
Sean Fields
Cap Marvel is a film in the past and you can keep certain
elements when you restart.
Yeah, that could work.
Okay, Avengers. Liked it, necessary. Will watch it less
nowadays.
JL Franke
Then if they're desperate, we find out that they've been in
an alternate universe where everyone's drawn badly by Rob Liefeld.
 |
| You knew this was coming. |
Marc Singer
I think some of them will probably "graduate" to
bigger and better things that take them out of the storyworld, as Thor clearly
will with the Asgardians. (If there are any Asgardians left after IW... poor
bastards.)
JL Franke
Avengers is a movie that I didn't much care for the first
time I watched it, but I get little nuances every time I rewatch it, which has
been a lot.
Marc Singer
I enjoyed both movies, in that kid-in-a-candy-store (or new
comics day) kind of way. I saw both of them twice in the theaters, and I've
rewatched Avengers once or twice at home.
They are fun to watch, but it's kind of like eating nothing
but candy.
Sean Fields
Avengers is a fun way to see first meetings.
JL Franke
Ultron had too many moments that I call Grrr moments. Things that pull me out of the film. Ultron being a jaunty little killer robot was
one. Vision just being the most awesome
at everything as well as a smooth Brit was another. And Vision picking up Thor's hammer and
everyone going, "Oh, okay, guess he's one of us now" was the
third. Also hated, hated, hated the bad
accents on Wanda and Pietro. Actually,
pretty much hated everything about Pietro.
Avengers I have a soft spot for because a) some of the
camera work by Whedon is just incredible and has been copied by others,
including the Crisis on Earth-X crossover last week, and b) Mark Ruffalo as the
Hulk.
Marc Singer
I liked Age of Ultron more than the movie probably merits.
Like I said, I saw it twice in the theaters, and this is not a movie that
rewards repeated viewings.
JL Franke
True that.
Marc Singer
But as soon as I hit that scene of all the Avengers in the
forest fighting Hydra... that just flips some switch deep in my subconscious
and I am eight years old again and I cannot believe I am actually watching an
Avengers movie. Much less one that has Vision and the Scarlet Witch!
Sean Fields
That was cool.
JL Franke
I love that battle scene.
Even though yet again the Avengers (including Captain America) kill
people and no one says a word about it. But that's a different panel as well, I
think. :-)
Sean Fields
Watching Age of Ultron after the last American Godzilla
made the twins weird to watch.
 |
| lol |
Marc Singer
Ultron suffers from being overstuffed with material and not
giving any of it room to breathe.
Sean Fields
Ha! Just realized we had Tony Stark as a villain already. Just
in a robot body.
JL Franke
Good point.
Marc Singer
Like, the whole thing with the Vision and Thor's hammer...
that's just a shorthand to establish that he's heroic, which is okay, except...
that completely shortcuts the whole point of the Vision's first appearance when
they don't know if he's a hero or a villain. It cuts off his moral arc because
they had to make room for that shitty cave sequence, you know?
And Quicksilver... not a great accent, I agree, but I think
I would like him better than the X-movies Pietro if they let him do the stuff
Pietro does.
JL Franke
Oh, the cave sequence.
What a waste. Especially since it
was a dark and mysterious teaser for a comedy movie.
Marc Singer
(Which means sticking around for subsequent movies and
being overprotective towards his sister. And a dick to the Vision.)
JL Franke
You and I will have to disagree on the X-movies Pietro, who
I find one of the highlights of the franchise.
Sean Fields
Have em both in Kick-Ass and be happy.
 |
| lol |
I like him in those movies, but the Avengers Pietro is much
closer to my Platonic ideal of Pietro from the comics.
JL Franke
Just needs a better actor. But I can see what you're
saying.
Marc Singer
True.
JL Franke
So is there anything else we want to cover? We've been at this longer than most Marvel
movies.
Marc Singer
We need an MCU J. Jonah Jameson. Like, now.
JL Franke
True. But can they
get anyone to top JK Simmons in that role?
 |
| JK laughs at the thought. |
Marc Singer
Nobody can. I think that's why they haven't featured him
since the Raimi movies.
More seriously, the teaser scenes... they have become my
least favorite parts of the Marvel movies.
They're never directed by the same people and they break up
the flow of the movies to do the set-up work that nobody wants to do in their
own films.
JL Franke
True. That is one of
the downsides of the tightly shared universe.
Marc Singer
If the Marvel movies go on past Infinity War... and they
are clearly too lucrative not to... I hope they disconnect them a little.
JL Franke
I am with you. I'd
like for them to feel more like independent movies. And maybe at the end you realize there's
actually a tapestry. They could get
Jonathan Hickman to design the overarching plot. :-)
So shall we wrap things up?
Any final thoughts?
Marc Singer
Nope. In the true spirit of Marvel, I think somebody who is
not a part of this panel should come in and write a teaser for the next panel.
Presumably involving some sort of stone or gem.
If you have a topic you'd like to see the Fifth World staff address, tweet the topic to @5thworldonline and include #FridayPanel in your tweet.
5W Friday Panel: Ranking the Marvel Movies!
Reviewed by Chris Maka
on
Friday, December 08, 2017
Rating:
Reviewed by Chris Maka
on
Friday, December 08, 2017
Rating:
